The Stomatognathic Equilibrium: A Comprehensive Analysis of Dental Occlusion and Its Systemic Interdependencies

By Dr. Agatha Bis

1. Introduction: The Functional Nexus of Human Physiology

In the realm of modern medical and dental science, the concept of dental occlusion has undergone a radical transformation. No longer viewed merely as the static interdigitation of maxillary and mandibular teeth - a simple geometric puzzle of cusps and fossae - occlusion is now recognized as the dynamic functional nexus of the stomatognathic system. This complex biological machinery comprises the dentition, the periodontal attachment apparatus, the temporomandibular joints (TMJs), the intricate neuromuscular complex of the craniocervical region, and the supporting skeletal framework.¹ The user’s inquiry considers that occlusion plays a role in "everything," a statement that, while clinically broad, finds profound validation in the intricate biomechanical, neurological, and physiological pathways that connect the mandible to the cranium, the cervical spine, the airway, and the central nervous system.

To comprehend the full scope of occlusal influence, one must look beyond the teeth themselves. The stomatognathic system is unique in the human body; it is the only system where a hard tissue endpoint (the teeth) dictates the position of a synovial joint (the TMJ) and regulates the resting tone of the skeletal musculature.² Unlike the knee or elbow, where muscles move the joint to a limit defined by ligaments, the closing muscles of the jaw move the mandible until the teeth stop it. If that stopping point (occlusion) is asynchronous with the physiological comfort of the joints and muscles, a pathological cascade begins. This cascade ripples outward, affecting not just the durability of the enamel but the health of the supporting bone, the integrity of the articular discs, the patency of the pharyngeal airway, and the postural stability of the head on the spine.³

This report serves as an exhaustive analysis of these interdependencies. It moves systematically from the microscopic neurophysiology of the periodontal ligament to the macroscopic mechanics of the temporomandibular joint, and finally to the systemic implications for airway and posture. It synthesizes current research to explain not only what happens when occlusion is disharmonious but why the body reacts in the specific, often destructive, ways that it does. We will examine the controversy surrounding the causality of Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD), the mechanisms of tooth wear including the debated abfraction lesion, and the "holy war" between competing philosophies of treatment. By establishing a foundational understanding of the "ideal" versus the "pathological," this document illuminates the critical role of occlusion in maintaining the homeostasis of the human body.

2. The Neurophysiology of the Occlusal Interface

The most profound insight into why occlusion affects the broader musculature and nervous system lies in understanding that teeth are not merely mechanical tools for mastication; they are sophisticated sensory organs. The interface between the tooth and the alveolar bone is the Periodontal Ligament (PDL), a fibrous connective tissue densely innervated with mechanoreceptors. These receptors serve as the primary proprioceptive sensors for the stomatognathic system, providing the central nervous system (CNS) with exquisite feedback regarding the magnitude, direction, and rate of occlusal loading.⁵

2.1. The Periodontal-Trigeminal Reflex Arc

The neurological pathway initiated by tooth contact is unique in human physiology. The cell bodies of the primary afferent neurons innervating the PDL are not located in a peripheral ganglion (like the dorsal root ganglion for spinal nerves) but are situated centrally within the Mesencephalic Nucleus of the Trigeminal Nerve (MesV) in the brainstem.³ This anatomical peculiarity places the sensory processing center directly adjacent to the motor nucleus of the trigeminal nerve, allowing for monosynaptic reflex arcs of exceptional speed.

Research utilizing electromyography (EMG) and microneurography has mapped the functional properties of this reflex loop. When a tooth encounters an object - be it a bolus of food or an opposing tooth - the PDL mechanoreceptors fire. The response of the system depends heavily on the intensity and rate of the stimulus. Studies involving controlled mechanical stimulation of human incisors have demonstrated that a rapid, high-force stimulus (mimicking a hard bite on a seed or a traumatic occlusal interference) elicits a short-latency inhibitory reflex in the ipsilateral masseter muscle.⁶ This "silent period," occurring with a latency of approximately 12 milliseconds, is a protective mechanism designed to instantly arrest jaw closure and prevent catastrophic tooth fracture.⁶

Conversely, low-threshold mechanoreceptors provide positive feedback during normal chewing. Evidence suggests that these receptors contribute to the continuous modulation of jaw-closing muscle activity, guiding the mandible into the position of Maximum Intercuspation (MIP).⁸ This guidance system ensures that the mandible seeks the most stable mechanical position where the teeth fit together best. However, when that "stable" position requires the jaw to deviate from its physiological trajectory, the neurophysiology shifts from guidance to pathology.

2.2 Central Pattern Generators and Muscle Engrams

Mastication is governed by a Central Pattern Generator (CPG) located in the brainstem, which produces the rhythmic activity of chewing.⁹ This intrinsic rhythm is not rigid; it is plastic and constantly modulated by peripheral feedback from the occlusion. When an occlusal interference exists - such as a "high" filling or a premature contact on a molar cusp - the sensory feedback from the PDL signals a "noxious" or unstable event.

To avoid this noxious contact, the CNS alters the motor output of the CPG. The lateral pterygoid muscles are recruited to steer the mandible around the interference, creating a deviated path of closure. Over time, this learned avoidance maneuver becomes encoded as a "muscle engram" or muscle memory.¹⁰ The engram is a conditioned reflex, reinforced thousands of times a day during swallowing and chewing.

The systemic consequence of this adaptation is profound. The masticatory muscles are never truly at rest. Even during sleep or idle moments, the musculature remains hyperactive, holding the jaw in a contrived position to avoid the interference. This chronic hyperactivity leads to the accumulation of metabolic waste products like lactic acid, causing ischemia and the deep, aching myofascial pain typical of Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD).¹¹ The formation of these engrams explains why a patient may not feel the high spot on a tooth consciously, yet suffers from chronic tension headaches; the brain has successfully programmed the muscles to avoid the tooth, but at the cost of muscle health.

2.3 Mechanoreceptor Specificity and Directionality

Further complexity is added by the directional sensitivity of the mechanoreceptors. Studies utilizing microneurography on human subjects have revealed that receptors in the PDL of posterior teeth are tuned to detect forces in specific directions. A single nerve fibre might respond vigorously to a disto-lingual force but remain silent to a mesio-buccal force.¹³ This directional tuning allows the brain to perceive the vector of occlusal forces with high precision.

However, the distribution of these receptors is not uniform. Anterior teeth (incisors and canines) have a much higher density of mechanoreceptors and lower force thresholds compared to posterior teeth (molars).¹³ This physiological difference underpins the concept of "Anterior Guidance." The sensitive anterior teeth are designed to perceive contact and initiate the reflex that shuts down the elevator muscles, thereby protecting the posterior teeth and the TMJ from excessive force. When this guidance is lost - due to wear, open bite, or restorative failure - the system loses its "off switch," leading to uncontrolled clenching forces on the posterior dentition.³ The resulting hyperactivity is not just a localized issue; it represents a failure of the sensory-motor feedback loop that regulates the entire masticatory apparatus.

However, the use of a leaf gauge or Lucia jig during restorative procedures should not be assumed to ensure physiologic mandibular positioning. An additional, clinically significant factor warrants consideration and will be addressed in the subsequent section.

3. Occlusion and the Temporomandibular Joint: Structural Interdependencies

The Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) is a ginglymoarthrodial joint, capable of both rotational (hinge) and translational (gliding) movements. It is the most complex joint in the human body, largely because it is a bilateral joint connected by a single bone (the mandible). The health of the TMJ is inextricably linked to occlusion because the teeth dictate the final position of the condyle within the glenoid fossa. When the teeth articulate in Maximum Intercuspation (MIP), they force the condyles into a specific spatial relationship with the skull. If that relationship is harmonious with the anatomy of the joint, the system is stable. If the occlusion forces the condyle out of its physiological seat, pathology ensues.

3.1 The Condyle-Disc Assembly and Orthopedic Stability

In a healthy, physiologically stable joint, the articular disc (meniscus) acts as a dense fibrous cushion interposed between the mandibular condyle and the temporal bone. The ideal orthopedic position, often termed Centric Relation (CR), places the condyle in the most superior and anterior position within the fossa, resting against the posterior slope of the articular eminence, with the thinnest portion of the disc properly interposed.¹⁵ This position is structurally sound because it loads the avascular, non-innervated tissues of the joint, which are designed to bear pressure.

→ However, when the occlusion (the fit of the teeth) does not coincide with this orthopedic position, the mandible must displace to allow the teeth to interdigitate. This is the crux of occlusal-structural disharmony. If the teeth force the mandible backward - a common occurrence in deep bite cases - the condyle is driven posteriorly into the retrodiscal tissues. Unlike the disc, the retrodiscal tissues are highly vascular and richly innervated. Chronic compression in this zone leads to retrodiscitis (inflammation), joint effusion (swelling), and significant pain.¹⁷ This inflammation can create a physical barrier, forcing the mandible slightly forward or to the side, which further disrupts the occlusion and creates a confusing clinical picture of shifting bites and variable pain.¹⁷

3.2 Internal Derangement: The Mechanics of the Click

One of the most common pathologies linked to occlusal disharmony is Internal Derangement, specifically anterior disc displacement. The lateral pterygoid muscle plays a pivotal role here. The superior head of the lateral pterygoid attaches directly to the articular disc and the condylar neck.¹⁸ As established in the neurophysiology section, occlusal interferences often trigger hyperactivity or spasm in the lateral pterygoid muscle as it attempts to steer the mandible.

Chronic hyper-contraction of the superior lateral pterygoid pulls the disc anteriorly and medially, dragging it off the head of the condyle.¹⁶ When the patient opens their mouth, the condyle must translate forward and "hop" back onto the disc to achieve full range of motion. This reduction of the disc produces the audible "click" or "pop" characteristic of early-stage TMD.¹⁵ If the condition progresses and the muscle spasm or ligament laxity worsens, the disc may become permanently displaced anteriorly (anterior disc displacement without reduction), acting as a mechanical doorstop that prevents the condyle from translating. This results in a "closed lock," where the patient has significantly limited mouth opening and deviation to the affected side.¹⁹

→ The lateral pterygoid muscle is not the sole contributor to temporomandibular joint clicking. The elevator muscle group plays a substantial role, particularly in the presence of malocclusion. As will be discussed further, hyperactivity of the elevator muscles, specifically the temporalis, masseter, and medial pterygoid, often predominates and contributes to progressive temporomandibular dysfunction through posterior displacement of the mandible when occlusion does not support the Optimal Physiologic Position (OPP).

In such cases, the influence of the lateral pterygoid becomes secondary to the sustained forces generated by the elevator musculature. This mechanism is frequently misunderstood, particularly in conservative management approaches that focus primarily on the lateral pterygoid. Interventions aimed solely at reducing lateral pterygoid activity, such as manual release techniques, may overlook the dominant role of the elevator muscles. When occlusal support is inadequate, elevator muscle hyperactivity can retrude the condyle, increasing joint loading and predisposing the articular disc to displacement, which ultimately manifests clinically as joint clicking.

3.3 Malocclusion Phenotypes and Joint Risk Factor

While the relationship between occlusion and TMD is multifactorial, specific occlusal phenotypes show stronger correlations with joint pathology, suggesting that certain bite relationships place inherently higher mechanical stress on the TMJ structure.

• Class II Malocclusion (Retrognathia): Individuals with Angle Class II malocclusion, particularly Division 1 (large overjet), demonstrate a specific predisposition to mandibular hypermobility and joint laxity. The retruded position of the mandible often forces the condyle posteriorly, increasing the risk of osteoarthritis and retrodiscal impingement.¹⁵ When combined with a deep bite (overbite > 5mm), the mandible is "locked" posteriorly, unable to function freely, which correlates with the highest prevalence of TMD symptoms.¹⁵

• Class III Malocclusion (Prognathia): In contrast to Class II, subjects with Class III malocclusion (underbite) are predisposed to mandibular hypo-mobility. The mechanical locking of the anterior crossbite restricts the functional envelope of motion, often leading to muscular strain as the patient attempts to chew within a confined range.¹⁵

• Posterior Crossbite: A unilateral posterior crossbite is perhaps the most functionally damaging malocclusion. To bring the teeth together in a crossbite, the mandible must shift laterally. This creates a functional asymmetry in the joints. The condyle on the shifting side often undergoes rotation and compression, while the contralateral condyle may be distracted (pulled out of the fossa). Studies have implicated this transverse displacement as a significant etiologic factor in the development of joint sounds, deviation, and osteoarthritis.¹⁵

• Open Bite: Skeletal open bites, particularly when associated with Class II patterns, are linked to ligamentous hyper-laxity and degenerative changes in the TMJ. The lack of anterior guidance in these patients means the posterior teeth bear all the occlusal load, depriving the joint of the protective "lift" mechanism provided by the incisors during protrusion.¹⁵

3.4 The Causality Debate: Biomedical vs. Biopsychosocial Models

It is imperative to address the controversy that permeates the literature regarding the causal link between occlusion and TMD. For much of the 20th century, the "Biomedical Model" prevailed, positing that malocclusion was the primary and direct cause of TMD. Under this dogma, every click or pop was an indication for irreversible occlusal therapy.²²

However, modern systematic reviews and the "Biopsychosocial Model" have introduced necessary nuance. The current consensus is that occlusion is a significant associated factor or risk factor, but rarely the sole cause.¹⁵ Causality is difficult to establish definitively because of the variable of biological adaptation. Two patients may have the exact same occlusal interference; one develops debilitating TMJ pain, while the other remains asymptomatic. The difference lies in their adaptive capacity, central sensitization, and psychological stressors.

The Biopsychosocial Model argues that while occlusion acts as a predisposing mechanical vulnerability - the "pebble in the shoe" - the onset of symptoms is often triggered by systemic factors such as stress, anxiety, or hormonal fluctuations that reduce the body's pain threshold or increase parafunctional habits like bruxism.²² Therefore, occlusion should be viewed as a critical component of the multifactorial puzzle. Treating the occlusion removes the mechanical perpetuator of the disease, allowing the biological system to heal, but it must be done with an awareness of the patient's overall psychosocial and systemic health.

4. The Myofascial Complex: The Engine of Dysfunction

The musculature of the head and neck is the effector system of occlusion. The bones and joints provide the framework, but the muscles provide the power and movement. As illustrated in the neurophysiology section, the muscles are enslaved to the sensory feedback from the teeth. When that feedback is pathological, the muscular response is one of hyperactivity, fatigue, and pain.

4.1 The Mechanism of Lateral Pterygoid Spasm

The lateral pterygoid muscle is frequently cited as the primary driver of occlusal-muscle dysfunction. It is a unique muscle with two distinct heads and functions. The inferior head is the primary depressor and protractor of the mandible, opening the jaw. The superior head, as previously noted, stabilizes the condyle-disc assembly during closure.

When an occlusal interference exists, particularly on the non-working side (e.g., the left second molar hits when the jaw moves to the right), the lateral pterygoid is forced into a state of contradictory contraction. To move the jaw to the right, the left lateral pterygoid must contract. However, if a tooth hits on the left side, the elevator muscles (masseter and temporalis) are trying to close the jaw while the pterygoid is trying to pull it forward and down to clear the interference. This "tug-of-war" creates an immense build-up of tension within the muscle belly.³

Because the lateral pterygoid lies deep within the infratemporal fossa, it is difficult to palpate directly. Consequently, the pain is often referred. Patients suffering from lateral pterygoid spasm often complain of deep retro-orbital pain (pain behind the eyes), "sinus" pressure where no sinus infection exists, or tension headaches that wrap around the temples.¹² This referred pain pattern often leads to misdiagnosis by non-dental specialists, who may treat the patient for migraines or sinusitis without recognizing the occlusal origin of the muscle tension.

4.2 Muscle Hyperactivity and Bruxism

Bruxism - the grinding or clenching of teeth - is a widespread parafunctional activity with a complex etiology. While central nervous system factors (stress, sleep architecture, dopamine pathways) are primary drivers, occlusion plays a critical role as a trigger and modulator of the intensity of bruxism (different from sleep bruxism).¹⁵

The "Theory of Occlusal Triggers" suggests that the subconscious brain attempts to "grind away" an occlusal interference to establish a more stable maximum intercuspation. When a patient has a high spot or a deflective contact, they may unconsciously rub their teeth against it during sleep, generating massive forces that far exceed those of normal chewing. This transforms a stress-release mechanism into a destructive cycle.²⁵

Research utilizing electromyography has shown that the specific scheme of occlusion influences the intensity of muscle contraction during bruxism. When posterior interferences are eliminated and "Canine Guidance" is established (where only the canines touch during lateral movements), the elevator muscles (masseter/temporalis) show significantly reduced EMG activity.³ This is because the mechanoreceptors in the canines and anterior teeth trigger an inhibitory reflex that shuts down the heavy closing muscles. This "disclusion" allows the muscles to rest even if the patient continues to brux. Conversely, when back teeth rub against back teeth (Group Function or interference), the muscles are encouraged to contract with maximal force, leading to hypertrophy, soreness, and the classic "square jaw" appearance of the chronic bruxer.¹¹

5. Structural Pathology of the Dentition: The Cost of Disharmony

The teeth themselves bear the physical scars of occlusal disharmony. When the forces of occlusion exceed the structural tolerance of the enamel, dentin, and supporting bone, the tooth structure fails. This failure manifests in various forms, ranging from wear to fracture, each telling a specific story about the nature of the destructive forces.

5.1 Attrition, Erosion, and Abrasion: A Differential Diagnosis

It is critical for the clinician to differentiate between the types of tooth wear, as each points to a different etiology.

• Attrition: This is defined as the physiological wear of tooth substance as a result of tooth-to-tooth contact.²⁶ In a harmonious occlusion, attrition is slow and minimal. However, in the presence of malocclusion or interferences, attrition becomes pathological. The hallmark of occlusal-driven attrition is the "wear facet" - a flat, shiny, well-defined spot on a cusp or incisal edge. These facets are the forensic evidence of the patient’s functional pathway; they show exactly where the patient is grinding to avoid an interference or where the envelope of function is constricted.²⁶

• Erosion: This is the chemical dissolution of tooth structure by acids (gastric or dietary). Erosion creates cupped-out, matte surfaces, often leaving restorative materials (fillings) standing proud above the tooth surface.²⁶ While primarily chemical, erosion softens the enamel, making it vastly more susceptible to occlusal wear.

• Abrasion: This is mechanical wear from foreign objects, most commonly toothbrush bristles. It typically presents as rounded, smooth-transition areas of wear at the gumline.

5.2 Abfraction: The Bio-Mechanical Controversy

Perhaps the most fascinating and debated lesion in dental occlusion is abfraction, technically known as a Non-Carious Cervical Lesion (NCCL). These are sharp, wedge-shaped defects that appear at the Cemento-Enamel Junction (CEJ), the neck of the tooth.

The Theory of Tensile Stress: The "Flexural Theory" or "Abfraction Theory" proposes that these lesions are caused by eccentric occlusal loading. When a tooth is subjected to heavy lateral forces (as occurs with an occlusal interference), the tooth does not move bodily; it flexes. The fulcrum of this bending is the cervical region, and this is where enamel is the thinnest. This flexion creates high tensile stress on one side of the tooth and compressive stress on the other. This tension disrupts the chemical bonds between the hydroxyapatite crystals of the enamel and dentin, causing them to micro-fracture and flake away.²⁷

5.3 Fremitus and Mobility: Signs of Active Trauma

Fremitus is the palpable vibration or movement of a tooth when the patient taps their teeth together in maximum intercuspation or performs excursive movements. It is a cardinal sign of active occlusal trauma.

Mechanism: When a tooth is "high" or receives force before its neighbours, the periodontal ligament (PDL) is subjected to excessive pressure. In an attempt to cushion the blow and allow the tooth to move away from the noxious force, the body resorbs the lamina dura (the bone lining the socket), widening the PDL space. This results in increased mobility.³¹

→ Clinical Significance: A tooth with fremitus is a tooth in distress. If the trauma is persistent, the body may not be able to repair the damage, leading to vertical bone loss, root resorption, and eventually the loss of the tooth. Clinical studies have shown a significant association between fremitus, attrition, gingival recession, and localized bone loss, confirming that occlusal trauma accelerates periodontal breakdown.³²

6. Systemic Interactions: The Airway, Cervical Spine, and Posture

The stomatognathic system does not function in isolation; it is biomechanically and neurologically integrated with the cervical spine and the respiratory system. The mandible, hyoid bone, and clavicle are connected by a chain of muscles - the suprahyoids and infrahyoids - that create a functional dependency between jaw position, head posture, and airway patency.

6.1 The Mandible-Hyoid-Airway Axis

The hyoid bone is unique in human anatomy as the only "floating" bone, not articulating directly with any other bone. It is suspended in a web of muscles connecting it to the mandible above, the cranial base behind, and the sternum and scapula below.³⁴ Because the tongue attaches to the hyoid and the mandible (via the genioglossus muscle), the position of the mandible directly dictates the volume of the posterior airway space.

Retrognathia and Airway Collapse: In patients with Class II malocclusion (retrognathic mandible), the mandible is positioned posteriorly. This carries the tongue base and hyoid bone backward, encroaching on the pharyngeal airway space. This anatomical constriction is a major risk factor for Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA). Studies have demonstrated that mandibular advancement (moving the jaw forward) pulls the hyoid bone anteriorly and superiorly, expanding the airway and stiffening the pharyngeal walls to prevent collapse.³⁵ This is the mechanism of action for Mandibular Advancement Devices (MADs) used to treat sleep apnea.

6.2 Forward Head Posture (FHP) as a Compensatory Mechanism

The body prioritizes respiration over everything else. When the airway is compromised by a retruded mandible (Class II), the body must adapt to maintain airflow. The primary compensatory mechanism is Forward Head Posture (FHP).

By thrusting the head forward and extending the neck (tilting the chin up), the anterior neck muscles are stretched, which mechanically pulls the mandible and hyoid bone away from the posterior pharyngeal wall, opening the airway.³⁷ While this adaptation saves the airway, it wreaks havoc on the cervical spine.

• Muscular Strain: FHP places chronic strain on the posterior cervical extensors (trapezius, splenius capitis) and the Sternocleidomastoid (SCM). The head weighs approximately 10-12 pounds; for every inch of forward posture, the effective load on the neck muscles doubles. This leads to chronic neck pain, stiffness, and tension headaches that are often misdiagnosed as purely orthopedic issues.⁴

• Loss of Lordosis: Over time, this posture alters the natural curvature of the cervical spine, leading to a loss of lordosis and potentially accelerating degenerative disc disease in the cervical vertebrae.

6.3 Postural Stability and Balance

The connection between occlusion and posture extends beyond simple mechanics to the neurological control of balance. The vestibular nucleus (balance center) and the trigeminal nucleus (dental sensation) are intimately connected in the brainstem.

Research utilizing stabilometry (force platforms) has shown a direct link between dental occlusion and total body sway. Studies indicate that creating an occlusal interference or altering the jaw position with a splint can immediately affect the center of pressure (CoP) and postural stability, particularly in the absence of visual cues.⁴ Specifically, individuals with Class II malocclusion tend to shift their center of pressure forward to compensate for the posterior position of the mandible. This suggests that "good posture" is physically impossible to maintain if the occlusion forces the jaw (and consequently the head) into a compensatory position to breathe or swallow.

6.4 Dental Distress Syndrome (DDS)

Some clinicians group these systemic effects under the umbrella of "Dental Distress Syndrome" (DDS). Proponents of this concept argue that a "distressed" bite sends erroneous feedback to the brain, up-regulating the sympathetic nervous system ("fight or flight") and reducing blood supply to the brain, leading to a host of systemic issues ranging from chronic fatigue to digestive disorders.⁴⁰

Scientific Standing: While the mechanistic links (trigeminal interactions, sympathetic up-regulation due to chronic pain) are biologically plausible, the broad systemic claims of DDS - such as it causing gynaecological problems or depression - often lack robust, double-blind clinical trial evidence.⁴² It is scientifically safer and more accurate to conclude that occlusal disharmony acts as a significant allostatic load or stressor on the Central Nervous System. It lowers the patient’s physiological reserve, making them more susceptible to other stressors, rather than being the direct and sole cause of distant systemic pathologies.

7. Diagnostic Protocols and Technology: Moving Beyond the "Blue Dot"

Historically, occlusal analysis was a subjective art form dependent on the clinician's "feel" and the patient's feedback. The standard of care has been, and in many places remains, the use of articulating paper - thin strips of ink-coated paper used to mark contact points on the teeth. However, the introduction of digital metrics has revealed the severe limitations of this analog approach.

7.1 The Fallacy of Articulating Paper
Articulating paper works on a simple principle: where the teeth touch, ink is transferred. The assumption has always been that a larger, darker mark indicates a heavier, more forceful contact. This assumption has been proven false.

Research comparing ink markings to digital force sensors explicitly demonstrates that the size of an ink mark does not correlate with the occlusal force applied.⁴³

• False Positives: A large, smeary mark often represents a "rubbing" contact where the teeth slid past each other with low force.

• False Negatives: A tiny, pinpoint dot can represent a massive amount of force concentrated on a single cusp tip - a highly destructive contact that may be dismissed by the clinician as insignificant.

• The Timing Blind Spot: Crucially, paper is static. It cannot tell the dentist which tooth hit first. In a dynamic system where reflexes are triggered in milliseconds, knowing the sequence of contact is vital. Paper shows "where," but it fails completely to show "when" or "how hard".⁴⁴ Relying solely on paper leads to "chasing the dots," often resulting in the removal of necessary physiological contacts while missing the actual traumatic interferences.

7.2 T-Scan and Digital Occlusal Analysis

To address these limitations, digital occlusion systems like the T-Scan have been developed. These systems utilize an ultra-thin, pressure-sensitive sensor that the patient bites into. The data is transmitted to a computer, which displays the occlusion as a dynamic movie.⁴⁶

Key Metrics Provided by Digital Analysis:

• Force Distribution: It quantifies the percentage of force on each tooth. A clinician can see, for example, that a single molar is bearing 40% of the total bite force, a recipe for fracture.

• Occlusion Time (OT): It measures the time from the first tooth contact to complete intercuspation. Prolonged OT indicates interferences that are preventing the jaw from closing smoothly.

• Disclusion Time (DT): This is the "gold standard" metric for dynamic occlusion. It measures how fast the posterior teeth separate during excursive movements. A Disclusion Time of less than 0.4 seconds is considered physiologic. Longer times indicate that the back teeth are dragging or interfering, which triggers muscle hyperactivity.¹¹

Systematic reviews indicate that while digital sensors have limitations (such as the thickness of the sensor potentially altering proprioception slightly), they provide significantly higher reliability in identifying traumatic contacts compared to paper alone, especially when balancing implants which lack PDL feedback and cannot "feel" the bite.⁴⁴

→ That said, this technology has important limitations that must be clearly understood. When used by a clinician who expects it to serve as a definitive solution for occlusal analysis, without a comprehensive understanding of TMJ health and condylar position, the data generated by the T-Scan can be misleading. Measurements taken from a posteriorly displaced mandibular position, especially in joints affected by degeneration, remodelling, and/or bone loss, may lead the clinician to inappropriate conclusions and subsequent adjustments or restorations based on a non-physiologic mandibular position.

→ Any digital occlusal technology must therefore be used strictly as an adjunct to clinical judgment. The clinician must first establish the Optimal Physiologic Position (OPP) of the mandible. Once OPP is accurately determined, the T-Scan becomes an invaluable tool for fine-tuning occlusion and achieving true muscular stability.

7.3 The Comprehensive Clinical Examination

Given the systemic reach of occlusion, a quick "bite check" is insufficient. A robust clinical examination protocol is required to diagnose occlusal disease.⁴⁸

1. History and Symptom Mapping: The exam begins with listening. Does the patient have headaches? Do they wake up with stiff muscles? Is there sensitivity to cold (a sign of pulpal stress from occlusion)?

2. Muscle Palpation: The clinician must palpate the muscles of mastication (masseter, temporalis) and the cervical muscles (SCM, trapezius). Tenderness or trigger points in these muscles are often the first sign of occlusal pathology, even before tooth damage is visible.

3. TMJ Load Testing: Before assessing the teeth, the joint must be tested. Can the condyles be loaded (pressed) firmly into the fossa without pain? If loading causes pain, the diagnosis is intracapsular (joint issue), and occlusal adjustments are contraindicated until the joint is stable.

4. Fremitus Testing: As detailed previously, the clinician places a finger on the upper teeth while the patient taps. Any vibration indicates trauma.

5. Centric Relation (CR) Assessment: The clinician manipulates the mandible to find the CR position (condyles seated) and compares it to the Maximum Intercuspation (MIP) position. The discrepancy between these two - the "slide" - is measured. A slide with a lateral component is particularly diagnostic for muscle pathology.

   → It is critical to recognize that joint loading should never be performed in a degenerated joint. Radiographic or clinical signs such as condylar flattening, erosion, sclerosis, osteophyte formation, or reduced joint space indicate joint misalignment and active or chronic condylar overload and degeneration. When the condyle is already retruded and subjected to continuous loading, further joint loading tests are contraindicated, even in the absence of patient-reported pain. A retruded condyle is inherently unstable and should not be forced further into the glenoid fossa through joint loading procedures. In such cases, the priority must be to establish the Optimal Physiologic Position (OPP) of the mandible before proceeding with any additional testing or treatment.

6. Load Testing the Occlusion: Using shim stock (ultra-thin foil) or digital sensors to verify which teeth hold the bite and which do not.

8. Therapeutic Approaches and Philosophical Discords

Treating occlusal disease involves managing the forces to ensure they are directed axially along the teeth and that the muscles are released from their hyperactive state. However, the method of achieving this is the subject of one of dentistry's deepest and most enduring philosophical divides.

8.1 Splint Therapy: The First Line of Defence

Occlusal splints (orthotics/nightguards) are reversible tools used to diagnose and treat TMD. They function by altering the occlusal scheme without permanently changing the teeth.

• Stabilization Splint (Flat Plane/Michigan Splint): This is the most common and universally accepted appliance. It provides a hard, flat, smooth surface that disengages the posterior teeth and covers all maxillary or mandibular teeth. By removing the interferences and the "locking" of the cusps, according to its proponents, “it allows the muscles to relax and the condyle to seat in its most comfortable physiological position (usually Centric Relation)”. It effectively "deprograms" the muscle engrams, breaking the cycle of habitual avoidance patterns.⁵¹

• Anterior Repositioning Splint (ARS): This appliance is designed with a ramp that forces the mandible to close in a forward (anterior) position. It is used specifically for anterior disc displacement with reduction (clicking joints). By keeping the jaw forward, it keeps the condyle on the disc, preventing the click. However, its long-term use is controversial. If worn 24/7, it is believed that “it can permanently alter the bite, creating a "posterior open bite" where the back teeth no longer touch.” Thus, it is often considered a temporary therapeutic measure to heal retrodiscal tissues before weaning the patient back to a stable position.⁵¹

→ I disagree with this belief. When worn full-time, this appliance creates an environment that allows the muscles, condyles, and capsular tissues to decompress, recover, and heal. As inflammation from chronic compression resolves and normal vascular and healing responses are restored, adaptive changes occur at multiple levels, including the retrodiscal tissues, condylar bone remodeling, and muscular relaxation associated with mandibular repositioning.

The resulting “sensation” of occlusal change is frequently misinterpreted as an actual bite change. In reality, these perceived changes reflect tissue healing, condylar remodeling, and muscle elongation, not tooth movement. The reason the teeth “no longer touch” is that, in the Optimal Physiologic Position (OPP), they were never in stable contact to begin with, and this discrepancy is what ultimately requires correction.

For this reason, I view an anterior repositioning appliance as the first step in mandibular and joint rehabilitation. It should be followed by restorative treatment, orthodontic correction, or a combination of both, to ensure that the dentition properly supports the mandible in OPP.

Anterior repositioning appliances should therefore be regarded as both a diagnostic tool and the initial phase of therapeutic intervention, not as a definitive or standalone treatment, as they are often used today.

8.2 Occlusal Equilibration (Coronoplasty)

Equilibration involves the precise, irreversible reshaping of tooth surfaces to remove interferences and establish a harmonious bite.

• The Goal: To create simultaneous, equal-intensity contacts on all teeth in centric closure, and immediate posterior disclusion in all excursive movements (canine guidance).⁴³

• Indications: It is indicated for patients with occlusal-muscle pain, extensive wear, or before major restorative work.

• Contraindications: It is strictly contraindicated in patients with unstable TMJs (active clicking or locking). You cannot adjust the bite if the hinge (the joint) is moving or degenerating. The joint must be stabilized (often via splint therapy) before the teeth are touched.⁵⁴

8.3 The "Holy War": Gnathology vs. Neuromuscular Dentistry

No report on occlusion is complete without addressing the schism between the two dominant schools of thought that govern how dentists approach the "ideal" bite.

Gnathology: The Joint-Centric Approach

• Philosophy: Gnathology, the "classic" school, prioritizes the TMJ. It asserts that the reference point for all occlusion must be the bone-to-bone relationship of the condyle in the fossa.

• Definition of Ideal: According to Gnathology, the ideal position is Centric Relation (CR), defined as the most superior-anterior position of the condyle against the articular eminence.

• Treatment Goal: To seat the condyles in CR and then adjust or restore the teeth to fit this position perfectly. The belief is that if the joint is stable, the muscles will adapt.⁵⁵

Neuromuscular Dentistry (NMD): The Muscle-Centric Approach

• Philosophy: NMD, the "physiologic" school, prioritizes the Muscles. It argues that "Centric Relation" is a strained, contrived position forced by the clinician.

• Definition of Ideal: According to NMD, the ideal position is the Myocentric trajectory. This is the position where the muscles of mastication are at their relaxed resting length.

• Methodology: NMD practitioners use Ultra-Low Frequency TENS (Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation) to fatigue and relax the muscles, erasing the engrams. They then record the bite in this relaxed position. This "neuromuscular bite" is often more open and forward than the Gnathological CR position.

• Treatment Goal: To build the bite to support the relaxed muscle position, believing that this optimizes head posture and airway patency.⁵⁵

The Conflict: The debate remains heated. Gnathologists argue that NMD positions are unstable and can overload the joint by positioning the condyle too far down the eminence. NMD proponents argue that Gnathology forces the jaw back (retrognathia), compressing the airway and the retrodiscal tissues.⁵⁷ In recent years, a middle ground (Bioesthetics) has emerged, attempting to respect both the structural stability of the joint and the functional comfort of the muscles, but the philosophical divide remains a defining feature of the field.⁵⁹

9. Conclusion: The Integrated Reality

The inquiry into dental occlusion reveals a system of staggering complexity that defies the simplistic view of "straight teeth." Far from being a localized mechanical interaction, occlusion acts as a primary regulator of the stomatognathic system, with tendrils reaching into the central nervous system, the cervical spine, and the respiratory pathway.

The evidence synthesized in this report confirms that:

1. TMJ Health: Malocclusion, particularly Class II and posterior crossbites, creates mechanical vulnerabilities that predispose the joint to internal derangement and osteoarthritis.

2. Muscle Health: Occlusal interferences drive muscle hyperactivity via high-speed trigeminal feedback loops, creating engrams that perpetuate chronic pain, tension headaches, and fatigue.

3. Tooth Health: The structural integrity of the dentition is compromised by non-axial forces, manifesting as attrition, mobility, and the controversial abfraction lesion.

4. Systemic Health: Through the mandible-hyoid-cervical chain, occlusion directly influences airway patency and head posture. A compromised bite can force the body into a forward head posture to breathe, linking dental health to chronic neck dysfunction.

Ultimately, the health of the "whole" is dependent on the equilibrium of the parts. Whether viewed through the lens of a gnathologist seeking joint stability or a neuromuscular dentist seeking muscular relaxation, the clinical imperative remains the same: to recognize that the teeth are not islands. They are the gears in a machine that breathes, balances, and senses. Establishing an occlusion that exists in harmony with the joints, muscles, and supporting structures is not just about saving teeth; it is about minimizing the physiological cost of living for the entire human body.

Works cited

1. Occlusion (dentistry) - Wikipedia, accessed December 19, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occlusion_(dentistry)

2. Occlusion - An Overview of Dental Anatomy - Dentalcare.com, accessed December 19, 2025, https://www.dentalcare.com/en-us/ce-courses/ce500/occlusion

3. The Physiology of Occlusion in Clinical Practice - Toronto Crown and Bridge Study Club, accessed December 19, 2025, https://www.tcbsc.net/pdfs/Toronto%20handout.Levy.pdf

4. Craniocervical Posture and Malocclusion: A Comprehensive Literature Review of Interdisciplinary Insights and Implications - PMC - NIH, accessed December 19, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11676848/

5. Teeth as Sensory Organs - Jay Harris Levy Occlusion, accessed December 19, 2025, https://www.jayharrislevy.com/uploads/1/2/4/3/124355079/teeth_as_sensory_organs.pdf

6. The roles of periodontal ligament mechanoreceptors in the reflex control of human jaw-closing muscles - PubMed, accessed December 19, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8883855/

7. The role of periodontal mechanoreceptors in mastication - ResearchGate, accessed December 19, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6579011_The_role_of_periodontal_mechanoreceptors_in_mastication

8. Evidence That Periodontal Pressoreceptors Provide Positive Feedback to Jaw Closing Muscles During Mastication - ResearchGate, accessed December 19, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/19505806_Evidence_That_Periodontal_Pressoreceptors_Provide_Positive_Feedback_to_Jaw_Closing_Muscles_During_Mastication

9. Masticatory Adaptation to Occlusal Changes - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH, accessed December 19, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7147355/

10. The Muscle Engram: The Reflex That Limits Conventional Occlusal Treatment, accessed December 19, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51841362_The_Muscle_Engram_The_Reflex_That_Limits_Conventional_Occlusal_Treatment

11. Reducing Chronic Massetter and Temporalis Muscular Hyperactivity with Computer-Guided Occlusal Adjustments | Compendium, accessed December 19, 2025, https://www.compendiumlive.com/2010/09/reducing-chronic-massetter-and-temporalis-muscular-hyperactivity-with-computer-guided-occlusal-adjustments/

12. Occlusal analysis and management of a patient with headache and temporomandibular joint sound: A case report - OAText, accessed December 19, 2025, https://www.oatext.com/occlusal-analysis-and-management-of-a-patient-with-headache-and-temporomandibular-joint-sound-a-case-report.php

13. Human periodontal mechanoreceptors : functional properties and role in jaw motor control, accessed December 19, 2025, https://openarchive.ki.se/articles/thesis/Human_periodontal_mechanoreceptors_functional_properties_and_role_in_jaw_motor_control/26909005

14. Comparison of the Physiological Properties of Human Periodontal-Masseteric Reflex Evoked by Incisor and Canine Stimulation - Frontiers, accessed December 19, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physiology/articles/10.3389/fphys.2012.00233/full

15. Occlusion and Temporomandibular Disorders: A Scoping Review ..., accessed December 19, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12112774/

16. Oral splint for temporomandibular joint disorders with revolutionary fluid system - PMC, accessed December 19, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3760352/

17. Occlusal changes secondary to temporomandibular joint conditions: a critical review and implications for clinical practice - PMC - NIH, accessed December 19, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4990372/

18. Jaw Pain: Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD) - Motion Specific Release, accessed December 19, 2025, https://www.motionspecificrelease.com/post/temporomandibular-disorders-tmd

19. Position Paper - AAOMS, accessed December 19, 2025, https://aaoms.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/tmj-contemporary-mgmt-position-paper.pdf

20. Orthodontics, Malocclusion - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf, accessed December 19, 2025, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK592395/

21. The Relationship between Occlusion and TMD - Scientific Research Publishing, accessed December 19, 2025, https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=73341

22. Review Article Temporomandibular Disorders: “Occlusion” Matters! - Radboud Repository, accessed December 19, 2025, https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/handle/2066/193417/193417.pdf

23. Occlusion, orthodontic treatment and temporomandibular disorders: A review - University of Michigan, accessed December 19, 2025, https://media.dent.umich.edu/labs/mcnamara/files/Occlusion,%20orthodontic%20treatment%20and%20temporomandibular%20disorders-%20A%20review.pdf

24. Relationship Between Occlusal Factors and Temporomandibular Disorders: A Systematic Literature Review - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed December 19, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10939299/

25. Association of Malocclusion with Temporomandibular Disorders: A Cross-Sectional Study, accessed December 19, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/13/16/4909

26. Dentist's Guide to Tooth Erosion, Attrition, Abrasion & Abfraction, accessed December 19, 2025, https://ostrowonline.usc.edu/dental-erosion-attrition-abrasion-abfraction/

27. Managing Tooth Mobility | Pocket Dentistry, accessed December 19, 2025, https://pocketdentistry.com/managing-tooth-mobility/

28. Abfraction: A review - PMC - NIH, accessed December 19, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3830231/

29. Abfraction lesions: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment options - PMC - NIH, accessed December 19, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4861607/

30. Abfraction lesions: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment options - PubMed, accessed December 19, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27217799/

31. Trauma from Occlusion - Concept Explained with Current Updates - Dentist Channel, accessed December 19, 2025, https://dentistchannel.online/trauma-from-occlusion-concept-explained-with-current-updates/article?for=people

32. Association of Trauma from Occlusion with Localized Gingival Recession in Mandibular Anterior Teeth - PMC - NIH, accessed December 19, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3075458/

33. Periodontal and Periapical Effects of Severity of Fremitus Due to Chronic Occlusal Trauma on Mandibular Incisors - DergiPark, accessed December 19, 2025, https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/4878792

34. A CBCT Morphometric Study of Hyoid Bone According to Skeletal and Breathing Patterns Using Multi-Factor Robust ANOVA - MDPI, accessed December 19, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/13/19/2423

35. Surgical hyoid bone repositioning effects on mandibular advancement and upper airway collapsibility: an anesthetized rabbit model study - Frontiers, accessed December 19, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physiology/articles/10.3389/fphys.2025.1618037/full

36. Peripharyngeal tissue deformation, stress distributions, and hyoid bone movement in response to mandibular advancement | Journal of Applied Physiology, accessed December 19, 2025, https://journals.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/japplphysiol.00668.2014

37. Oral Breathing Effects on Malocclusions and Mandibular Posture: Complex Consequences on Dentofacial Development in Pediatric Orthodontics - NIH, accessed December 19, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11763795/

38. Etiology of Class II malocclusions - AAPD, accessed December 19, 2025, https://www.aapd.org/globalassets/media/publications/archives/shaughnessy-10-04.pdf

39. Is There a Correlation between Dental Occlusion, Postural Stability and Selected Gait Parameters in Adults? - MDPI, accessed December 19, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/1652

40. An Inside Look of Dental Distress Syndrome - Holistic Dentist Seattle ..., accessed December 19, 2025, https://mitchmarderdds.com/blog/an-inside-look-of-dental-distress-syndrome/

41. The dental distress syndrome – What is it? | EBDG, accessed December 19, 2025, https://www.ebdg.com.au/blog/the-dental-distress-syndrome-what-is-it/

42. The Dental Distress Syndrome Quantified Dr. A.C. Fonder, accessed December 19, 2025, http://stamforddentist.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/ddsquantified.pdf

43. Occlusal Analysis in Natural Dentition: Systematic Review - PMC - NIH, accessed December 19, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10569841/

44. Insights into Occlusal Analysis: Articulating Paper versus Digital Devices - PMC, accessed December 19, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11313013/

45. Insights into Occlusal Analysis: Articulating Paper versus Digital Devices - PubMed, accessed December 19, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39124772/

46. Digital Occlusion Analysis after Orthodontic Treatment: Capabilities of the Intraoral Scanner and T-Scan Novus System - MDPI, accessed December 19, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/7/4335

47. Effect of T-scan Occlusal Analysis and Adjustment Versus Articulating Paper on Stresses Transmitted to Single Mandibular Implant Supported Prosthesis, accessed December 19, 2025, https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/11604

48. Clinical Occlusal Analysis & TMD Screening Exam - Van Haywood, accessed December 19, 2025, http://www.vanhaywood.com/uploads/articlespage/occlusion/Clinical%20Occlusal%20Analysis%20TMD%20screenHaywood.pdf

49. The Patient Exam, accessed December 19, 2025, https://www.augusta.edu/dentaltable/pdfs/ThePatientExam.pdf

50. How to Perform an Occlusal Analysis - Distance Learning Programs, accessed December 19, 2025, https://ostrowonline.usc.edu/occlusal-analysis/

51. Comparison of Effectiveness of Stabilization Splint, Anterior Repositioning Splint and Behavioral Therapy in Treatment of Disc Displacement with - Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, accessed December 19, 2025, https://www.ftrdergisi.com/pdf.php?&id=2873

52. Guardians of the temporomandibular joint: The occlusal splints- an overview - Arch Dent Res - Archives of Dental Research, accessed December 19, 2025, https://adr.org.in/archive/volume/12/issue/2/article/771

53. 3D-Printed anterior repositioning splint versus stabilization splint for patients with anterior disc displacement with reduction: A randomized cross-over clinical trial - PMC - NIH, accessed December 19, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12057826/

54. Occlusal Equilibration- Does it work? - The Dawson Academy, accessed December 19, 2025, https://thedawsonacademy.com/occlusal-equilibration-does-it-work/

55. THE GNATHOLOGICAL APPROACH versus THE NEUROMUSCULAR APPROACH - Occlusion Connections, accessed December 19, 2025, https://occlusionconnections.com/occlusion/the-gnathological-approach-versus-the-neuromuscular-approach/

56. An evidence-based evaluation of the concept of centric relation in the 21st century - PubMed, accessed December 19, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30202837/

57. Politics vs. Science - ICCMO, accessed December 19, 2025, https://iccmo.org/neuromuscular-controversies-politics-v-science

58. (PDF) Neuromuscular dentistry - A myth or reality: A literature review - ResearchGate, accessed December 19, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359291495_Neuromuscular_dentistry_-_A_myth_or_reality_A_literature_reviewThe Etiology of Temporomandibular Disorders: Implications for Treatment, accessed December 19, 2025, https://files.jofph.com/files/article/20240105-106/pdf/jop_15_2_greene1.pdf